Graham Percival wrote:
Is this really correct? #(define ... ) defines the Scheme function.
#(nopc) runs it. Is \nopc just another syntax for #(nopc) ?
Er, I confess that I have no idea. I was trying to summarize the
"Defining shortcuts for scheme code", since it looked like useful
information. But on second glance, it looks like Han-Wen's solution
involved calling it with #(nopc), while Erik's solution had a different
definition but was called with \nopc.
Erik's solution is the neater one, although Scheme buffs might prefer
mine. Erik's solution
\nopc
makes a music function. Normally, a music function takes a music
argument, like \compressMusic, but Erik's doesn't take any.
My solution just directly calls the Scheme nopc function.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
