On Mon, 8 May 2006 04:07, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > there's a bit of confusion with the breakable property, because it both > signals whether or not items are on nonmusical Paper_columns (see eg. > the use of Item::is_breakable in separating-line-group-engraver.cc) and > to signal whether a nonmusical column is in fact eligible as a line > break (for which line-break-permission is the right property). > > I think it would be better to get rid of this double use, and have a > 'line-break-permission which should be in spaceable-grob or perhaps > paper-column, and is controlled with BreakEvents, while there also is a > 'non-musical property, part of item-interface. (a better name for > non-musical is of course welcome)
Should I then split Item::is_breakable into, say, Item::is_non_musical and Paper_column::is_breakable? _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
