Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nicolas Sceaux schreef: >>> In general, I think it makes sense to move parser substitutions as >>> much as possible to the iterators, eg. at some point, we should also >>> change the implementation of mmrests, \clef and \time. >>> >>> Nicolas, does that make sense to you too? >> I'm clueless about what you're both talking about... (I don't know >> what >> iterators do). So it does not make sense to me, sorry :o) > > The subject is the internal representation for syntactical > constructs. For example, > > \clef "G" > > translates to 3 property set commands. I was speculating that for > display-music it would be easier to maintain if we had a > ClefChangeEvent, and move the translation of "G" to values for > clefGlyph/middleCPosition/clefPosition further to the back of > LilyPond.
Oh yes, ok, indeed it would ease the translation back from music expression to lilypond notation. The patterns matchers are easily breakable. nicolas _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
