Ah, ok; I understand. Still, I think that using \partial in this
situation is kind of abuse that accidentally works. I guess the real
problem here is that lily models repeat signs as bar lines; but I am also
wondering how a repeat sign should actually look like, if it does not
coincide with the bound of a bar (it probably should not consist of a
vertical line)...
Greetings,
Juergen
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
One common example where people today use it in the middle of a score is
repeats, where the repeat sign is in the middle of a bar
(especially in combination with prima/secunda volta). Currently, LilyPond
doesn't automatically take this into account. Of course, the best solution in
this situation would be if LilyPond treated the measure position correctly
for repeats.
/Mats
Quoting Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
please note that \partial or \upbeat, whatever you call it, has
musicologically a special meaning: the first, incomplete bar, and the last
bar of a piece or of a major section of a piece (typically the bar before
the next "||" bar glyph) should sum up to a complete bar.
For example, if a song with 4/4 meter starts with "\partial 4 f4", the last
bar should, by convention, have a total length of 3 quarter notes. Having
said that, you never should use "\partial" or "\upbeat" somewhere within a
piece. If lily nevertheless accepts it within a piece without issuing an
error or warning, I consider this a bug.
Having a bar within a piece that differs in length from the foreassigned
meter is a different concept.
Greetings,
Juergen
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Graham Percival wrote:
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:54, Graham Percival wrote:
IMO, \partial is just fine. If there's some confusion, by all means we
can clarify the docs. As always, I gratefully accept any specific
recommendations for doc changes.
IMHO using \partial in the middle of a bar is confusing; I think there
should be some other command that sets the length of an individual bar.
Do you think it would make sense to invent such a command?
I'd rather keep the behavior of \partial -- ie "add an extra X duration to
this bar", rather than "this bar should have X duration". That said, I
suppose we could rename \partial to \addTime or something like that. I
don't think that \upbeat is appropriate, but we could find some other
name.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel