Joe Neeman escreveu:
On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 17:29 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Joe Neeman schreef:
On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Joe Neeman schreef:
Mostly because at the time that I wrote it, I couldn't figure out how to
handle arbitrary length argument lists in scheme (the only way I
currently know is to build the list of arguments, cons in the function
I think you're looking for the apply function,
(apply func arg-list)
Ah yes, that's much better. So did you want me to put call_pure_function
in scheme?
yes, I think so. The most important thing is that subsystems should not
cross the C++/Scheme divide all too often. Since most of the func->pure
-func code is in Scheme, I think it's best we keep improvements there.
How's this one? I also changed from using SCM_UNDEFINED to
SCM_UNSPECIFIED so I could restore grob-closure.cc and added
pure-outside-slur-callback.
Looks good please apply if output-distance agrees.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
