hi,
I'm attempting to softcode \accepts and friends. Should the order of \accepts
calls be significant in absence of appropriate \defaultchild? I.e., if we have
\layout {
\context {\Score \accepts "Foo" \accepts "Bar" }
\context {\name Foo \accepts "Baz" }
\context {\name Bar \accepts "Baz" }
}
\new Score \new Baz { c d e }
.. then the path to Baz is ambiguous. Should we ideally throw a warning and
randomly pick either foo or bar, or should the order be defined by the order
of the \accepts calls?
I would like the first approach better, because ambiguous context paths are
rare and should be clarified; the \defaultchild mechanism should be
sufficient for normal uses.
--
Erik
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
