Francisco Vila escreveu: > El sáb, 24 de feb de 2007, a las 10:27:51 +0100, laurent-ducos dijo: >> We noticed by using lilypond that the invocation of lilypond is so >> greedy in resource processor. They is a little tedious for the use of >> lilypond in cgi at the time of connection multiples. Does Y have to you >> it a means of calling upon lilypond in a more sparing mode? Is the speed >> of execution of lilypond it a criterion of development? Thank you > > I propose (at least in windows) to leave a part of the program > resident so that invocation are less painful. Office and OpenOffice do > this and Lily needs this as well, I think.
The best way to do this, is to write a scheme extension that reads file names from a socket or a pipe, processes those. Then you can save on the startup time of LilyPond. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
