In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Han-Wen
Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
no, it's correct. Staff lines are in layer -1 (I think), while the
rest is in layer 0.
So, using a whiteout in a layer 0 object only guarantees to cover stafflines.
In which case, I'd write "since staff lines are in a *lower* layer"
("different" could mean they're in layer 1, which means it's guaranteed
NOT to work :-)
Cheers,
Wol
2007/4/19, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is there a bug in input/regression/whiteout.ly ?
In 2.11.22, I see ledger lines whited out, but the note stem is still
there. The texidoc says
\header{
texidoc = "The whiteout command underlays a white box under a
markup. The whitening effect only is only guaranteed for staff lines,
since staff lines are in a different layer. "
}
Should the second sentence be "... is only guarenteed for staff lines,
since **stem lines** are in a different layer." ?
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
Anthony W. Youngman - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
