2008/2/2, Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > However, I see a very important feature missing in this approach: > An incipit should (at least in my view) be thought of as the beginning of > a piece written in notation that comes close to the autograph or first > publishing. That is, the incipit actually starts the music. Then, at > some point (e.g. after the clef or after the first note of each voice or > after the first few notes), the music is reset to its start, the notation > switches to modern style, and printing starts again, this time from the > very beginning to the very end.
Hi, I concur with Juergen here. Since the incipit is a completely different piece of notation (eg. whose spacing and beat counting should not influence the main music), this should be implemented similiar to the hack with a \score inside the instrument name. I think the best approach is to figure out what the problems with that approach are, and try to solve those. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
