Hi List, I would like to propose that we rename the textual crescendo and decrescendo commands to names that are more intuitive and are more internally consistent. The current implementation uses the "hairpin" commands to revert the "text" commands, but I do not think this solution is very intuitive. Here is the list of the commands in question:
\setTextCresc \setTextDecresc \setTextDecr \setTextDim \setHairpinCresc \setHairpinDecresc \setHairpinDim Since hairpins are the default output -- using \< and \> -- shouldn't the revert commands indicate that the "textual" (de)crescendo marks are being turned off? Maybe we should keep the \set... commands that set the alternative behavior (textual crescendos, etc.) and use \unset... commands as their opposites. Or we could rename them using the on/off method: \textCrescOn, \textCrescOff, etc. Does anyone else think this is a good idea? I think it is worth considering. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
