On Sat, 24 May 2008 15:59:13 +0200 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/05/24, Neil Puttock wrote: > > > Could there be something wrong with the patch? It's attached if you > > want to have a look. > > The patch looks fine. Oops, my fault. I applied the patch and compiled it, but ended up with an untracked file (that indicating... thing) so I just deleted it. > Graham, I'm almost sure you tested docs compilation before pushing to > Git, but might have you applied the patch with 'patch' command and > forgot to add the file to Git? Of course I used `patch'. It's one less git idiodicy to deal with. > I would recommend to apply patches formatted with git-format-patch > with 'git am 0001-commit-foo.patch', which requires less fussing with > Git in case the patch applies cleanly: git-am adds and deletes files > automatically, and it commits automatically with original message and > author. Hmm, ok. I'll try that next time. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
