On 8/18/08 3:41 PM, "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/18 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> Done, patch is attached. Okay to apply?
>
> Reinhold, this is great!
>
> I've noticed you "tagged" this new markup command as "music"; although
> I'm fine with it, I wonder if there would be a proper way to regroup
> all fret-diagrams and harp-pedal-diagrams in a same category of the
> docs (that could be named, I don't know, "Specific diagram
> notations"?)
> (the reason why I'm asking that is that I'm precisely working on this
> part of the docs right now)
> Of course, we'd have to rename Nicolas' fret-diagram category into
> "diagram" or whatever, and possibly change the title of Appendix B8.5;
> the good news is, since all of Carl's commands begin with an "f" and
> all harp related things begin with an "h", these commands won't be
> mixed up :-)
>
> Carl, Reinhold, anyone, comments?
>
Great idea!
I think that changing from fret-diagram to something else makes great sense.
It should cover fret diagrams, harp pedal diagrams, woodwind-fingering
diagrams, etc.
playing-diagrams
fingering-diagrams (although pedals aren't played with the fingers...)
tutorial-diagrams
I think I'd probably come down to fingering-diagrams; I can't figure out a
good title that covers both fingers and pedals.
Carl
P.S. Reinhold, I haven't checked the code yet. Have you put
harp-diagram-details as part of the text interface? I think it should go
there, since it is a markup.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
