On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 22:02 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2008/8/19 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > No thanks, I just pushed the second patch and I've done a much smaller > > and cleaner version of the first one. > > This works great! (there was just a glitch in a doc string, which I > have taken the liberty to correct myself) > > Do you think it's clean enough to be submitted to Han-Wen now, or does > it still need some polishing?
I think it's ok as-is. There is one TODO (regarding moving a function from C++ to scheme) but I don't think it's crucial. Joe _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
