On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:01 PM, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> can someone refresh my mind? I'm generally against catering for >> broken/old platforms, but maybe we can make an exception for >> convert-ly ; what broke for python 2.4 ? > > The conversion rules written with decorator syntax. It's certainly a > lot easier and faster to revert this change and write the syntax rules > added after this change than shipping Python 2.4 with Darwin-PPC > binaries -- please correct me if I'm wrong. Are you OK with these > changes on convert-ly? Ah right. What's a reasonable estimate for the number of 10.3 users? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
