> here is some documentation for the arrowed accidentals. Since I
> found it the most natural way of typesetting, it uses Trevor's
> notation for up and down arrows (but also mentions the alternative
> ways discussed before). Please let me know if for some reason
> Trevor's default names are not desired so that I can rewrite the
> docs accordingly. Note that the attached patches supersede the one
> in my last email.
I'm not going to apply this -- doc guys, please approve and apply if
you think everything is fine. Main reason is that I have no opinion
w.r.t. the pitch names of notes with arrowed accidentals.
BTW, what's the difference between a sharp accidental with three
horizontal bars and a sharp accidental with an up arrow?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
