Pushed to origin/master. Thanks Jonathan.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Kulp" <[email protected]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Graham Percival" <[email protected]>; "David Kastrup"
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Carl D. Sorensen"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: Bug or feature?
Patch attached!
Jon
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Trevor Daniels
<[email protected]>wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:38 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:34 AM
I'd prefer this as a @knownissues or even a @warning. I
/definitely/ wouldn't include it in the same parapraph --
remember
that the number of people reading a paragraph decreases
exponentially as the length of the paragraph increases[1].
But this paragraph, even with the warning, is only
4 lines long!? And it is the first paragraph in the
section.
Making it a @knownissue would be far worse - this
would place it several pages below.
People normally wouldn't expect the order of the \includes to
matter, so IMO we should make this quite visible.
I guess a @warning might be better.
So do you guys want me to re-work this as a @warning?
Please. Perhaps a warning to replace the text where
it is and also add it as a @knownissue too.
Thanks
Trevor
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
