>>>>> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Kulp <jonlancek...@gmail.com> writes:
Jonathan> Peter Chubb wrote: >> There are alternatives. The main objection I have to the form of >> makefile you propose is that dependencies are not tracked, so >> editing one file will either not rebuild anything, or will rebuild >> everything (depending on the rules). >> >> In general, it's best to name all the inputs directly. >> -- Jonathan> An excellent objection. I've tried this makefile you Jonathan> posted: Jonathan> And I like how it tracks whether the pdf is up-to-date. I'm Jonathan> trying now to adapt it to the stamitz symphony, and I've Jonathan> gotten it to compile the score, but if I run "make score" Jonathan> again (while there's a current pdf output of the file in the Jonathan> PDF dir), instead of saying it's up-to-date, it compiles the Jonathan> file again. Can you tell me which part of the makefile Jonathan> keeps track of the pdf output? Here's what I'm using: Get rid of the explicit commands for score--- Make tries to find a file called score, and when there isn;t one, it runs the commands associated with it. The implicit commands should build the score for you. Dr Peter Chubb http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au ERTOS within National ICT Australia A university is a non-profit organisation only in the sense that it spends everything it gets ... Luca Turin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
