On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:58:24PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2009/5/20 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > > Oh yes. I can't even count the number of times I've sung "A sharp > > eight dot dash dash dash dot open left parenthesis". It makes > > writing lilypond very easy! > > Italian note names are much more pleasing from a vocal point of view :-)
I can't count the numbers of times I've sang "mi eight dot dash dash dash dot open left parenthesis", either. :P > > Umm... how is this worse than everything else in lilypond? > > \relative, \clef, \key, \time (vs. \times!), > > \numericTimeSignature... > > Yes, but that's not the first thing you have to type. (Granted, > \relative will be required.) Ok, you have a point here. > > I'm not certain how these suggestions would define the scope of > > the command. > > I'm not certain I understand this sentence. How can renaming a > shortcut limit its scope? Renaming it wouldn't, but something like \relative c' "italiano" { } would. Not that that's the only, or best, option, but on a technical sense it might be easier to handle. By the way, who's offering to spend the 5-20 hours required to implement such changes to the parser? (whatever we end up deciding) I mean, if nobody's willing to do it, then there's no point discussing it further. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel