2009/5/22 John Mandereau <john.mander...@gmail.com>: > Francisco Vila a écrit : >> committishes themselves are not checked > > They can now, but I was puzzled by the truckload of bad committishes I found > in Spnaish texidocs,
They were all the same, and no one existed before that. >so I applied my auto-committish-setting hack to them > too. I'm not very sure on the correctness of the committishes I changes this > way, so I advice to randomly check two or three of them. By default I couldn't guess which one to put, so I put the comm. of a merge node in our branch. How can they be so wrong? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
