On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:58:53PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > Neil Puttock wrote: > > A much more suitable home would be lily-library.scm, but you'd > > need to document them manually as Graham suggests. > > Oh my gosh, why was I never told about lily-library.scm before?
Is this a serious question? :) Because the people who knew about it already knew about it, and there wasn't somebody making a huge push to document everything and stop relying on oral history. That's why it's so vital that we have people like you, trying to do stuff and discovering holes. :) > That is one of the most useful little files I've seen in a while. > Is it mentioned in the docs? I doubt it, and a quick grep for lily-lib didn't produce anything. Could you add it to NR 6 somewhere? I'm not too picky about exactly where it does; that chapter will hopefully be rewritten in a few months. Just make sure it's there so the editor sees all the info. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
