On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: >> Francisco Vila a écrit : >>> 2009/6/6 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: >>> >>>> Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the >>>> downloaded .exe". >>> >>> GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the >>> builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their >>> names. >>> >> Agreed. We should call binaries by Lily dev team "GUB binaries" or >> whatever you like that sounds correct, but not just >> GUB, which is the building framework. > > Err... "GUB" stands for "Grand Unified Binary". It was a play on > the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) of physics. > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=GUB&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-devel&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Aearly
Interesting. So did the name evolve over time? Now it appears to be called the Grand Unified Builder: http://lilypond.org/gub/ -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
