Mark Polesky wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:>
Yep, sounds good. Would you prefer that I send text for review
and then create the patch when we like it, or should I just
create a patch to be reviewed?
You're a Doc editor, so why don't you just create a patch. I'll
review it once it's created.
Jon, sorry if I upset you with my "grievances" yesterday. Just so
you know, Bertalan Fodor graciously helped me off-list and things
seem back to normal, so there's no need to worry.
No worries, wasn't upset at all, just concerned that your system
got borked.
And thank you for the .iso and the great work you put into it! A
few glitches on my (temperamental) computer shouldn't diminish
that.
But as not-somebody-not-Mark, I'd like to make one tiny suggestion.
I think it would be helpful if no step was omitted. Assume the
reader has *no* context to understand the consequence or relevance
of any step.
Sorry, Mark. After seeing your prodigious scheme hacks I just
assumed you were leagues ahead of me. :)
Bert and Carl have already responded to the specific points below
and I'd second what they said.
What I'll do in the CG is make recommendations on specs such as
amount of RAM, disk space and so forth, but I'm hesitant to go
through step-by-stem for installation of a virtual machine, since
1) that would mean we throw our lot in with a specific
virtualization tool (I use VirtualBox, and so do others, but there
are other tools that will do just as well or maybe better); and 2)
I'd be duplicating stuff from the VirtualBox manual, which is a
better place to learn about the installation of VMs and the
various things you have to do to get them set up how you want them.
What I can say in CG is that this whole process is known to work
well on VirtualBox, and maybe make a reminder to install "guest
additions" to get fullscreen if one is using VBox. For
virtualization tools, I'd say refer to their manuals and I could
even link to a couple of them online.
Jon
For example, when you say "allocate memory and so forth", that's
about 5 steps that could be spelled out.
1) Memory: use the recommended base size of 384 MB?
* are there system requirements for compiling LilyPond?
* Do I need more RAM to compile the program than I would to
compile just the docs?
* I initially selected 384, but then VirtualBox warned me that
384 MB is more than 75% of all my RAM (I'm on an older
computer with only 504 MB RAM). That would've left 120 MB for
everything else and the warning said that was a bad idea. But
I didn't know what to lower it to, or if I could lower it at
all. So I changed the 384 to 200. I still don't know if it
matters.
2) Boot Hard Disk (Primary Master): select
Create new hard disk: select
3) Storage type: Dynamically exapanding storage?
4) Virtual Location Disk Location: use recommended location
5) Virtual Location Disk Size: use recommended (8 GB)?
* Does compiling LilyPond require more/less?
* What if I only want to allocate 2GB (hypothetically)?
* If I select 8GB, it'll start at the base size in expand
dynamically anyway, right? It would be good to understand
this.
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel