On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:20:01PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > Do we still need NR B.10 "List of articulations"?
Yes, since the point is to show the \commands. Unless B.6 includes that info? I suppose that for many examples, scripts.staccato => \staccato is a safe enough assumption to make. However, I don't think there's any \ufermata command, nor a \circlus. Umm, so it's not a safe assumption to make. :) Now, there might be a way to automatically generate B.10, in which case we could alter that to fit inside B.6... but this might require looking at the parser. I'm not certain how this part of the internals fits together. Anyway, if that could be done, that would be quite nice. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel