I'd like to start working on the plan below real soon now so it can be finished by the end of August; if it isn't I might have no time to complete this within a year.
Le samedi 11 juillet 2009 à 03:21 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit : > docs/ > docs/learning.tely > docs/learning/*.itely > docs/notation.tely > docs/notation/*.itely > + glossary, essay, application > > docs/snippets.tely (moved from input/lsr/ and input/new/) > docs/snippets/*.ly > > docs/contributors.texi > docs/contributors/*.texi > > docs/web.texi > docs/web/*.itexi > > docs/topdocs/ > docs/topdocs/changes.texi > docs/topdocs/compile.texi I don't see the points of keeping a subdirectory topdocs: if the documents in this directory play a so different role from other, or should be grouped in any way, let's put them in the same toplevel .texi/.tely document. Putting this issue aside, what I propose is Documentation | |- web.tely -> lilypond | |- learning.tely -> lilypond-learning |- notation.tely -> lilypond-notation \- ...idem for glossary, essay, application, snippet, devel, changes, authors > regression/ new location of input/regressions/ > input/ completely deleted Unlike the overhaul of documention structure, I don't see what we gain in renaming/removing input/regression in terms of building (makefiles) simplification or maintenance, so I'm not keen on doing this without stronger arguments. About the switch to SCons we have mentioned, I think the simplification to be brought to the Documentation makefiles makes me feel this switch not so useful as I used to think, i.e. I consider dropping this for more than one year. Unless there are objections, I'll start applying this plan by moving the three manuals and snippets very soon. Cheers, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel