2009/7/27 Michael Käppler <xmichae...@web.de>:
>
>> Attached are two samples for long and short strokes with varying
>> width. The long strokes have height = staff_space, the shorter ones
>> height = 0.8*staff_space (is that a reasonable choice?). Each file
>> contains strokes of each type with ten different widths, namely
>> i*0.05*staff_space, for i=1,..,10. Which do you prefer? I tend to lean
>> towards #4 for the shorter ones and #4 or #5 for the longer ones, but
>> that's just my personal aesthetics.
>>
>
> Me too, #4 or #5. But I think the long stroke could be longer, maybe
> 1.2*staff_space or so?

Like in the attached file? In this case, I'm inclined to favour #5 (or
maybe even #6), but I'm only judging this based on the appearance on
the screen because I don't have a good printer at hand. Thus any
further opinions or suggestions for improvement are still very
welcome.

Max

Attachment: vstroke_long__1.2_staffspace.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to