2009/7/27 Michael Käppler <xmichae...@web.de>: > >> Attached are two samples for long and short strokes with varying >> width. The long strokes have height = staff_space, the shorter ones >> height = 0.8*staff_space (is that a reasonable choice?). Each file >> contains strokes of each type with ten different widths, namely >> i*0.05*staff_space, for i=1,..,10. Which do you prefer? I tend to lean >> towards #4 for the shorter ones and #4 or #5 for the longer ones, but >> that's just my personal aesthetics. >> > > Me too, #4 or #5. But I think the long stroke could be longer, maybe > 1.2*staff_space or so?
Like in the attached file? In this case, I'm inclined to favour #5 (or maybe even #6), but I'm only judging this based on the appearance on the screen because I don't have a good printer at hand. Thus any further opinions or suggestions for improvement are still very welcome. Max
vstroke_long__1.2_staffspace.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel