On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:41:33PM +0900, Maximilian Albert wrote: > 2009/7/27 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > > I'm not at all certain that these arrows should be indicated with > > different pitch names -- why not define > > \accidentalArrowsOn > > \accidentalArrowsOff > > or some such commands, then use the regular pitch names? > > I guess for the same reason why you don't want generic \sharpOn, > \sharpOff, \flatOn, \flatOff commands -- because arrowed accidentals > indicate a pitch different from the regular one and you would still > like to be able to easily use notes with arrowed accidentals along > notes with regular accidentals. But I'm not a user of microtonal music > at all, so let's wait for the experts to chime in.
Hmm. Basically, I'm concerned about mixing the presentation and definition (content) of pitches this closely. But I admit that I'm not very familiar with this area, so I'll bow out of the discussion now and let others comment. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
