----- Original Message ----
> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com>
> To: Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:57:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Guidelines for bounding boxes?
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Mark Poleskywrote:
> >> They were an in-crowd joke at some point, but I think the joke
> >> has lasted long enough. I approve of changes that bring
> >> regularity in this file naming scheme.
> >
> > Then I propose the following Dutch->English changes:
> >
> > feta-banier feta-flags
> > feta-beugel feta-braces
> > feta-bolletjes feta-noteheads
> > feta-din-code feta-dynamics
>
> We had the -code files as a contrast to the feta-din{NUMBER}, which
> included the -code ones.
Is there a problem with "feta-dynamics"? The last feta-din{NUMBER}
was removed 5 years ago:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=90fac
And feta-din was removed 4 years ago:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=c17ec
> > feta-eindelijk feta-rests
> > feta-haak feta-brackettips
> > feta-klef feta-clefs
> > feta-nummer-code feta-numbers
> > feta-pendaal feta-pedal
>
> be consistent with plural vs singular.
I was just following the fet_begingroup strings.
Are you suggesting to change line 18 of feta-pendaal.mf from
fet_begingroup ("pedal");
to
fet_begingroup ("pedals");
?
I'm not opposed to it, but that would entail a lot of other
changes, too. And what about "timesigs"? "accordions"?
- Mark
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel