2009/8/13 Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com>: > I'm guessing something is wrong with my understanding because the > hash (#) doesn't appear anywhere in the "LilyPond grammar", > appendix, and I'm thinking of it as a unary operator meaning > "interpret the following as a scheme-expression using guile".
You're looking in the wrong place: the lexer scans for a hash (see lexer.ll line 335 et seq.) and returns SCM_TOKEN to the parser if found; see lines 15 & 16 of the grammar. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
