On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Werner LEMBERG<w...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Additionally, it seems that some `convert' versions are buggy. >> Look, for example, at the attached image, created with version >> 6.4.3. For testing, I've manually issued the current Makefile rule >> >> convert -depth 8 \ >> -alpha Off \ >> -background white \ >> -layers flatten \ >> -trim \ >> text-input-1-annotate.svg \ >> text-input-1-annotate.png >> >> (omitting the problematic `+repage' option as mentioned in another >> mail). As can be seen, the green and red rectangles no longer cover >> the letters exactly since there is missing indentation. > > I've just upgraded to convert 6.5.4: Now `+repage' is recognized, but > the result is even worse! No fonts have been changed; calling the > above creates the attached image, which uses horrible fonts, and the > offset is still wrong. Sigh. > > Anyone else who gets this?
No, my output is fine (convert 6.5.4.8). It's possible that your imagemagick is not compiled with rsvg support. You can check this with $ convert identify -list format | grep SVG But we can't rely on that. As great as imagemagick is, its native SVG->PNG conversion capabilities are horrible. Even when it uses the rsvg backend, the PNG output is not optimal, and I had to add all of those command line switches to improve the output. I really wish we could convert the SVG text to paths, but apparently there are plans to *translate* the examples, so we would need the text data from the SVG files. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
