Le vendredi 06 novembre 2009 à 19:43 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 08:14:27PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > > I warmly, highly and definitely second doc/v2.xx (first value of xx will > > be 14), which is clearer than having stable docs at toplevel or in /web, > > I'll agree if you're ok with a doc/stable/ symlink that points to > doc/v2.xx/
I don't understand: this symlink already exists on lilypond.org, and I've never requested to remove it. > I would also like the offline target of the docs to share this > directory layout. (minus the "stable" symlink) I don't understand this, this is asking for complication. IMO the directory munging should happen in www_post.py (or one of the modules it uses), so it could be applied only for online target. I don't see the point of trying to produce the final structure directory in WWW-1 and WWW-2 building stages, as the docs produced in this stage are not very usable anyway (think of broken images in splitted HTML docs). > > stable docs at toplevel -- think on all users that wait little time or > > even sometimes a while before upgrading to the newest stable branch. > > I don't follow this statement? Do you use bookmarks in your web browser? Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
