Anybody want to save me a half an hour of maintenance, and a few hours of sanity? Look this up. (alternately, if you already know apache, just answer the question)
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:31:31PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > The technical reasons for using web/ and doc/v2.xx are: > > - easier rsyncing, moving, verifying > > - clean namespace -- currently we have quite some other > > things at the root. it's easy to get collisions, we > > need to really think this through very well before > > going forward with this > > Can't we have the directory structure internally with /web/ , > /download/ what have you, and use some serverside URL rewriting to > make translate > > /foo/ > > into > > /web/foo/ > > ? Does apache have mechanisms for rewriting the serving path without > rewriting the URL that appears in browser window? I would like this. I'd like that a lot. We could keep the simpler build structure, but still have simpler urls. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
