At 06:23 on 13 Nov 2009, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi, > > > Could it be an option to make <c e g>4*8 do the obvious thing? > > Or even { <c e g>4 }*8 ? > > That would be so much more natural. The first already does > > something, but not something which I would call useful. > > I use it all the time, actually.
Me too. Please don't change the meaning of * > > The second bombs out. In contrast, q feels rather hackish. > > Since the patch (as I understand it) ensures that q does not > duplicate anything except the notes, q allows for > > <c e g>8-. q-^ q-. q-^ And indeed: <c e g>4 q8 q8 which looks extremely useful to me. -- Mark Knoop _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel