On 2009/11/26 09:13:58, nicolas.sceaux wrote:
Hi,
Maybe this patch, as a first step, should focus on the unification of
the syntax
of the two macros?
Hi Nicolas, patch set 3 already makes make-builtin-markup-command upwards-compatible with make-markup-command in its current form. I have not tampered with make-markup-command at all because I don't want to invest work in an approach with code duplication. So I am first trying to get a hang of the problem that the code duplication and the toplevel module definition are trying to solve. That's where I would actually have a chance to learn something. If you feel like taking the work from patch set 3 yourself, go ahead. But it may be less work to wait and see where I get with my attempts. All the best. http://codereview.appspot.com/160048 _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
