Am Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2009 18:42:47 schrieb James Bailey: > quote-during.ly and quote.ly appear to be fundamentally identical. > Additionally, quote-during references cueDuring in the explanatory > text, although cueDuring isn't used in the example.
On the other hand. quote.ly speaks of "\quote", which doesn't exists any more, so it should probably be junked in favor of quote-during.ly. AFAICS, cueDuring works the same as quoteDuring, so it's not that bad if this functionality is not tested... Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
