On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > It has whatever priority people give it. Given that nobody has > sent a patch, I can only assume that nobody cares about this.
Oops, I should clarify: nobody's sent a patch, **or even indicated a willingness to work on it**. If somebody said they wanted to work on it, I could guide them towards the solution; I'm pretty certain I know exactly how to fix it. But I'm not going to spend the 2 minutes it would take for me to fix it unless I'm working on other parts of that file, which won't happen for another few days. As it happens, on my way to university I decided that my near-term worklist would be: GLISS website, GUB building from a dedicated "release" branch, and then top-level website files. If I'd chosen to order those differently, then I'd have probably added this file to master today. (to re-iterate: I prioritize "dealing with contributors" as more important than my own work, so if somebody _had_ indicated they wanted to work on it, I would have helped them do that, and the whole thing would have been finished in October) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel