On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:37:55AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> 
> On 1/2/10 1:51 AM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, I was thinking about \overrideBeamSettings, which has been
> > around for a few months (a year?).  You're quite right; there's no
> > reason not to change \overrideTimeSignatureSettings now.
> 
> Actually, I intend to propose that \overrideBeamSettings be replaced with
> \xxxTimeSignatureSettings (which should be acceptable because
> \overrideBeamSettings is not part of a stable release).

Ok, thanks for putting up with my scatterbrained approach to the
issue.  Yes, that's fine.

Cheers,
- Graham


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to