On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2010-01-17, Graham Percival wrote: >> I'm a bit confused by some of the changes to the git commands for >> release/unstable. > > It's a trade-off.
Ah, ok. I now agree that the "merge" is the better option. > [1] In case of a "fast-forward" merge, where release/unstable is > identical to master except for the commits at the tip, a merge commit > will not be created. This makes "merge" look more appealing; I'd expect this to apply most of the time. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
