Am Montag, 22. März 2010 16:51:50 schrieben Sie: > Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Monday, March 22, 2010 3:45 PM > > > The patch allows this as well (It treats \with and > > \contextmodifications > > exactly the same)... However, \with just doesn't tell you that > > this is only > > about Context modifications. > > > > So, do you all think that we should only go with \with? > > I would prefer that. Are multiple \withs permitted?
Yes, multiple nested \with are allowed, and \with is now also allowed as the value of a variable and inside a \context definition. That's basically all that my patch does (internally, it also adds a C++ object for \with instead of simply treating it as a scheme list of modifications). Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel