Am Montag, 22. März 2010 16:51:50 schrieben Sie:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Monday, March 22, 2010 3:45 PM
> 
> > The patch allows this as well (It treats \with and
> > \contextmodifications
> > exactly the same)... However, \with just doesn't tell you that
> > this is only
> > about Context modifications.
> > 
> > So, do you all think that we should only go with \with?
> 
> I would prefer that.  Are multiple \withs permitted?

Yes, multiple nested \with are allowed, and \with is now also allowed as the 
value of a variable and inside a \context definition. That's basically all 
that my patch does (internally, it also adds a C++ object for \with instead of 
simply treating it as a scheme list of modifications).

Cheers,
Reinhold

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to