Jan and I were talking about listing academic papers which cite or use lilypond, but I soon realized that it wasn't obvious where to put these. Were they "productions" or "publications" ? If the latter, how many people would encounter them while they were just browsing the introduction?
http://lilypond.org/website/productions.html http://lilypond.org/website/testimonials.html http://lilypond.org/website/publications.html After a bit of thought, I'd like to propose condensing these into three sections, both inside Introduction. Productions: list of concerts, sheet music, programs using lilypond (as a backend, not programs to help write lilypond input) Reviews: published articles about lilypond, and testimonials. Academia: material which we wrote (including the Essay), and peer-reviewed articles which cite or use lilypond. This would also allow us to get rid of the "Backend" section, which has always been a bit ridiculous. Thoughts? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
