On 4/19/10 11:49 AM, "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:54:15AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Took a look at lilypond-book.py. Did one change and am just now
>>>> recompiling.
>>>>
>>>> The change is fairly obvious (hope it works):
>>>
>>> It didn't, but the following on Rietveld should:
>>>
>>> <URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/813048>
>>
>> I like the general idea; I'll try testing it tomorrow.
>>
>> A few caveats:
>> - we definitely need a CHANGES entry for this syntax change.
>
> I don't know how to do this one.
Simply put an entry in Documentation/changes.tely that describes the new
lilypond-book syntax. There's a guide to those changes in the top of
Documentation/changes.tely.
<snip>
> Done. Somewhat annoyingly, one occurence is
>
> Documentation/misc/CHANGES-0.1:969: - changed \begin[options]{mudela} to
> \begin{mudela}[options]
>
> This suggests that in version 0.1 somebody already fixed exactly that
> LaTeX syntax problem 12 years ago. And the fix did not survive.
Maybe that's why there was that piece of code that didn't make any sense....
HTH,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
