On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 20. April 2010 18:47:27 schrieben Sie: >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:31:11PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: >> > I'm beginning to think about the \cresc, \dim >> > and \decresc text commands again. Shall we really wait that long?
Given that this change has been waiting for a year, and we're still not even close to releasing 2.14, let along 3.0... and since we haven't seen a surge of new users concerned about stability coming to help us... let's go ahead with this. >> Good point. What was your opinion on \newcresc again? > > I don't like it. With good reasons, especially the last one. > -) \cresc, \dim, etc. are not even documented, so I don't see any reason to > make so much fuss about these commands. In particular, the documentation only > introduces \<,\>,\cr,\decr (which are all equivalent forms for hairpins in > postfix notation). For text crescendi, the \crescTextCresc prefix setter > commands are documented. But the prefix \cresc, \dim, \decresc commands are > never even mentioned (I checked the 2.10, 2.11, 2.12 and 2.13 documentation). > Only the ly/spanner-init.ly file contains their definitions together with the > comment > % STOP: junkme! Does anybody have any other syntax changes they want to propose? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
