Le 29 avr. 2010 à 20:27, David Kastrup a écrit : > What type signatures would be actually permissable under the assumption > that they are supported by lexer and parser? > > It is somewhat clear to me that we can't have markup-list followed by > markup in the arguments. Anything else?
I'd say, a markup-list command signature should follow the pattern: scheme* markup* markup-list* that is, any number of scheme arguments, then any number of single markup arguments, then any number of markup-list arguments, even though I don't know if having several markup list arguments is useful or not (and if it's doable). _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
