Dear Xavier, Am Montag, 3. Mai 2010 22:40:01 schrieb Xavier Scheuer: > 2010/5/3 Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com>: > > Yes, this is the way around the "issue". > > > > BTW, I pushed that patch a minute ago. > > Seen it. > > BTW sorry for having "polluted" this thread with my selfish > considerations about "custom dynamics" or "text aligned on dynamics".
No, I don't accept your apologies ;-) To the contrary: It is important to discuss stuff! After all, it is quite possible to have a civilized discussion here on lilypond-devel (even though at times things seem to heat up unnecessarily). Just because someone suggests something different from what I'm proposing doesn't mean he is wrong or that he tries to diminish the value of my thoughts or my work. To the contrary, your comments made me think once again how the commands are exactly supposed to work. In this case, I had good facts (and thus good arguments). In other cases, I don't, and then we can find a solution together. > This (and my syntax suggestions) should have waited for the GLISS. No, in this particular case, it was better to clear up all confusion now, since they are quasi-new commands (undocumented/unsupported before, so we could easily change them...). Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
