Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 5/4/10 12:46 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: >> >> >>> This is a serious question I'd like to ask you. If you were the king >>> of LilyPond, what would you establish as the workflow? I'd really >>> like to hear your opinion. >> >> I'd not prohibit any work flow that can be maintained with single-line >> git commands. That includes posting patch series (using >> git-format-patch and git-mail) and private and public branches. There >> are graphical tools for dealing with git branches and commits, there is >> Emacs. The established development environment for Lilypond already is >> a GNU/Linux machine (even if it is a virtual one), so the usual caveats >> about git workflows on Windows machines don't apply. >> > > For me, a requirement to use Emacs is a much bigger hurdle than the > requirement to sign up for a gmail account.
I was not talking about a requirement, but an option. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
