2010/5/18 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > I tried to remove the #foo if "foo" matched > the "foo.html" portion, but I couldn't easily get rid of the #.
Now I understand certain mysterious pieces of code. lc_last was broken and so was remove_unneeded_anchor. I will concentrate on removing the # part completely. >>(we agree in that target >> and anchors must match, do we?) > > No, we don't agree. In >80% of our links, we don't need the #foo > portion at all, and they only get in the way. As long as they > don't *break* anything, I don't mind having a #foo there, but they > *do* break things on the website. t2h has obvious mistakes in the code, but I think there are few things we can not do in our hook functions. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
