On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is this patch correct? > > Interval has a default constructor, so in general addinig > initialization is not necessary. You can check the constructor to > undersand why your patch is not correct.
Oops, thanks for the correction. Sorry for the noise. -Patrck _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
