On 14 June 2010 15:34, Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de> wrote: > Besides, I tried to tackle the issue I mentioned here: > <http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg51242.html>, which is > that nested fill-lines used to shift their contents by some amount to the > right.
Heh, I was just about to post a fix for that myself (http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=382), using a slightly different approach: checking whether the text-width equals or exceeds line-width. + (line-stencils (if (and (= word-count 1) + (not (>= text-width line-width))) + (list point-stencil (car stencils) point-stencil) stencils))) I like your approach better though. ;) > For some reason, I don't seem to be able to build the regtests; so all this > should be taken with care, I did not really check if it breaks anything. It compiles fine without any breakages. > And once again, please clean up the indentation. The "real" sources just > look like a complete mess in my Emacs configuration. I did not try to > understand this, but rather to guess my tabs and spaces to fit... Doesn't C-M-\ indent a region for you automatically? One thing your patch doesn't cover is Reinhold's problem with compound time signature formatting (see http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=732); I wonder whether we should just add his suggestion for translating the stencil returned by \center-column onto its left edge (which would simplify your \fill-line fix.) Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
