>> Looks good to me. It would be nice if I could say
>>
>> \path #0.25 #'miter #'square ##f #samplePath
>>
>> instead of using numbers for the second and third parameter. Is this
>> possible?
>
> How about defining constants path:miter and path:square instead? Then
> \path does not need special code, and the command would just be
>
> \path #0.25 #path:miter #path:square ...
Hmm. I don't like the ugly `path:' prefix. Usually, we don't have
this in arguments to lilypond commands, AFAIK. From a syntactical
point of view, I can't see an immediate benefit of saying
#path:miter
instead of
#'miter
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
