Op zondag 04-07-2010 om 19:54 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef n.putt...@gmail.com:
> > Alas, it can't. When adding staff-bar to that list, the broken > > marks appear next to the bar numbers, right at the start of the > > staves. > > That's a shame. It would be great if the symbol order in > 'break-align-symbols determined the priority (like it does for > RehearsalMark/BarNumber). It does. The symbol order does determine the priority. Problem is, at start of a stave the *only* symbol that is present is the staff bar. > > Okay...so I've added the break-aligned-interface. It makes sense > > to have this position added - this is probably not the only symbol > > that we want positioned like this? > > I'm still confused as to why it's necessary, since it's only useful for > ordering break-aligned grobs inside the stave; ditto for the defaults > for 'break-align-symbol and 'break-align-symbols. It is not necessary, we could scrap both of these. I figure however, that when adding break-aligned-ness to other engravers (text-spanner etc), it could would be nice if they could make use of mm-rest's alignment position. Possibly it's better to remove both and add when needed -- I don't know. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
