Interesting...thank you. I completely missed that. Sorry for the clutter :-(
On 7/29/10 9:36 PM, "Neil Puttock" <n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 July 2010 20:34, Mike Solomon <mike...@ufl.edu> wrote: >> I think that this patch is the easiest way to assure that the break >> processing will happen when do_break_processing is called (although I could >> be wrong), whereas creating a grob doesn't get you a spanner's break >> processing. > > Have you looked at the macros which creates each type of grob? All > they do is call the same internal function (internal_make_grob), then > check validity using dynamic_cast. Each type of grob gets the correct > properties/interfaces/class initialized from the description in > all-grob-descriptions, so I can't see why there would be any problems > later on with break processing. > > Cheers, > Neil > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
